<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Version of ImgZoom in Development</title>
	<atom:link href="http://odyniec.net/blog/2010/03/new-version-of-imgzoom-in-development/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://odyniec.net/blog/2010/03/new-version-of-imgzoom-in-development/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 17:40:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michal Wojciechowski</title>
		<link>http://odyniec.net/blog/2010/03/new-version-of-imgzoom-in-development/comment-page-1/#comment-3783</link>
		<dc:creator>Michal Wojciechowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 10:21:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://odyniec.net/blog/?p=445#comment-3783</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your feedback. I agree that keeping the frame shown for the time of the animation would be better, unfortunately it&#039;s not possible due to technical limitations -- the frame is a set of HTML elements and can&#039;t be rendered using SVG/VML.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your feedback. I agree that keeping the frame shown for the time of the animation would be better, unfortunately it&#8217;s not possible due to technical limitations &#8212; the frame is a set of HTML elements and can&#8217;t be rendered using SVG/VML.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://odyniec.net/blog/2010/03/new-version-of-imgzoom-in-development/comment-page-1/#comment-3717</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 08:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://odyniec.net/blog/?p=445#comment-3717</guid>
		<description>Thank you for reply.I&#039;ve already send you a mail with my application.
New version works nice on Safari on Mac/Leopard.
Just 2 remarques:
- It&#039;s a visual break having the thumbs without and the zoomed image with a frame around, I think the zoom-animation would look more fluid and natural having both looking the same way.But I guess this is just a question of personal CSS-styling.
-When you click on the prev/next button, clicking outside the big image doesn&#039;t switch back anymore the opened image, unless you click the empty place of the zoomed image.I found clicking outside for switch back and a full view of all the thumbnails very useful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for reply.I&#8217;ve already send you a mail with my application.<br />
New version works nice on Safari on Mac/Leopard.<br />
Just 2 remarques:<br />
- It&#8217;s a visual break having the thumbs without and the zoomed image with a frame around, I think the zoom-animation would look more fluid and natural having both looking the same way.But I guess this is just a question of personal CSS-styling.<br />
-When you click on the prev/next button, clicking outside the big image doesn&#8217;t switch back anymore the opened image, unless you click the empty place of the zoomed image.I found clicking outside for switch back and a full view of all the thumbnails very useful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michal Wojciechowski</title>
		<link>http://odyniec.net/blog/2010/03/new-version-of-imgzoom-in-development/comment-page-1/#comment-3645</link>
		<dc:creator>Michal Wojciechowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 00:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://odyniec.net/blog/?p=445#comment-3645</guid>
		<description>No, at least not without some hacking. The new version will probably have an option that will let you do that. If you don&#039;t want to wait for it, I might be able to provide a quick workaround for you -- but I&#039;d have to take a look at your application first. Feel free to contact me by e-mail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, at least not without some hacking. The new version will probably have an option that will let you do that. If you don&#8217;t want to wait for it, I might be able to provide a quick workaround for you &#8212; but I&#8217;d have to take a look at your application first. Feel free to contact me by e-mail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://odyniec.net/blog/2010/03/new-version-of-imgzoom-in-development/comment-page-1/#comment-3638</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 13:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://odyniec.net/blog/?p=445#comment-3638</guid>
		<description>Nice work!
Thanks for sharing.
I plan to use the old version, but I would like to set a custom position (instead of the default centered) for the big image.
Is this possible?
Thanks in advance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice work!<br />
Thanks for sharing.<br />
I plan to use the old version, but I would like to set a custom position (instead of the default centered) for the big image.<br />
Is this possible?<br />
Thanks in advance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
